CharityVillage.com logo

QuickGuides Nonprofit Neighbourhood Volunteer & Donate Resources and Library Marketplace Supplier Directory Campus News & Events Jobs Advertise Main/Home
  Resources & Library
   
   Path:  Main Street > Resources/Library > Research Articles > Feature Article

Alternatives to e-mail newsletters - RSS

By Gillian Kerr, RealWorld Systems
The information in this article is current as of January 11, 2004.

E-mail newsletters are an important way for nonprofits to communicate with donors, members, and other stakeholders, but they are rapidly losing their effectiveness because of the overwhelming amount of e-mail traffic, especially spam.

Spam messages often try to look like legitimate e-mail newsletters, even providing 'unsubscribe' messages at the bottom. E-mail users have learned not to reply to spam messages, even to unsubscribe requests, because it will only result in more spam. Consequently, real e-mail newsletters are getting mixed up with spam by people who forgot or didn't realize they signed up for them. In the next year or two, nonprofits must figure out how to prevent their e-mail communications from causing anger and resentment among the people they are trying to connect to. Spam rage is growing, and many legitimate e-mailers will be caught up in the backlash.

The new Canadian online privacy legislation that came into effect on January 1, 2004 will also have an impact. Even nonprofits that are not directly affected by the law (which lays out requirements for managing private information about individuals) will be affected by the growing resentment around intrusive communications and lack of privacy. You can safely assume that most people are going to be trying to avoid additional unwanted e-mails, even from you.

Here are some suggestions for how to minimize backlash and begin planning for potential new channels of communication that may be seen as less intrusive.

Make it crystal clear when people sign up for newsletters

Many nonprofits trade mailing lists for their direct response campaigns, or collect names and contact information any way they can - from special events, social networks, donor lists, and so on. Expect to see increasing resistance and consumer complaints, or just as bad, quiet frustration and resentment. You need to explicitly ask whether it is alright to share information about the respondent, and whether it is alright to send them communications in the future.

This will be difficult for many fundraisers, because they are constantly trying to deepen the relationships they already have with donors. I recently made a donation that I thought was anonymous, specifically because I don't want more junk mail. Two weeks later, I got a package of totally unwanted information in the mailbox. In talking to many other donors, I'm getting a picture of an ongoing struggle of wills between charities that want to communicate with us, and donors who are overloaded with information and want to make up their own minds without being hounded.

On the other hand, I sometimes do want to find information about charities or particular issues of concern. It's very difficult to find and nonprofits are going to have to figure out how to communicate better with donors who are ready to 'buy'. United Ways have an important role, and opportunity, here.

Be careful about fundraising with e-mails

It used to be clever and cute to get individuals to 'sell' your charity to people in their social networks using viral marketing - encouraging donors to send requests to all of their friends, and so on. Stop it. Or if you insist on using this approach, be aware that many people, and many companies who pay for the e-mail services, the bandwidth, and the employees' time that are used up in handling your pleas for support, are getting very tired of it.

Make it really, really easy to unsubscribe

If you do send out e-mail newsletters (and despite everything I'm saying here, it's still the best way to update people on what's happening), make it extremely easy for people to stop getting them. For example, don't force them to remember the e-mail address that they used when they first signed up for it - most people have had more than one e-mail address over the years, and many people have five or six. There are technical ways to do this; some e-mail newsletters contain the identification of the person in the unsubscribe link itself. And you must test the unsubscribe function. Often when I try to stop receiving a newsletter, the link doesn't work.

Consider offering RSS subscriptions, and moving away from e-mail newsletters as other options get more popular

E-mail users are going to start demanding control over their e-mail communication. Spam and junk mail filters are already blocking many legitimate e-mail newsletters, and this trend will continue. On the other hand, e-mail is a wonderful tool for receiving customized news that matters to people. I believe that professionals will soon divide messages into three separate channels - e-mail from specified colleagues, organizations or friends; subscriptions to specified news channels; and everything else. E-mails in the third category will be discarded or passed through severe filters that will routinely delete most of them.

One promising approach to the second category - subscriptions to specified news channels - is already spreading rapidly through the technology world. It is called RSS, or 'Really Simple Syndication'.

A Globe and Mail story on September 25, 2003 described RSS as a technology that might supplant e-mail newsletters and help to eliminate spam. "RSS, short for Really Simple Syndication -- also known as Rich Site Summary -- is most commonly described as a news aggregator designed to facilitate the distribution of on-line content...[It] doesn't require the use of e-mail to reach consumers. Instead, news headlines and associated links are delivered directly to the user, who can view stories in a program browser or click through to the complete articles on-line...

"RSS is being touted as the latest weapon in the fight against spam and the newest solution to on-line content distribution. It's a system that's easy to install and employ; RSS readers can be Web-browser-based, stand-alone desktop applications, even integrated into Microsoft Outlook...There are currently tens of thousands of free opt-in RSS publisher "feeds" available on the Web (see Syndic8.com and News Is Free for directories). The top 100 most subscribed feeds, as listed by Radio UserLand, regularly include Wired News, CNN Sports, The Wall Street Journal and Business 2.0. But feeds also exist for the smallest of Web logs (blogs), housing the thoughts of random Internet users in on-line journal form."

This is really interesting. I've seen RSS in use for years, but never thought of them as a mainstream alternative to e-mail newsletters. It allows users to manage their subscriptions directly instead of trying to remember which newsletters they signed up for and whether they are risking more spam if they try to unsubscribe. The approach could be used to communicate between community groups, especially on advocacy issues, as an alternative to ActionApps slices. Most blogs offer RSS syndication, so it's something that a small agency could set up in a few hours. I have cancelled most of my newsletters and replaced them with RSS feeds that I can turn on and off as I wish.

For more information and resources on RSS readers, see Weblogs Compendium - RSS Readers. For example, NewsGator and Intravnews work within Outlook, pulling all of your subscribed newsletters into a folder that you can read or manage when you're offline.

**********
Gillian Kerr, Ph.D., C.Psych.
President, RealWorld Systems

gkerr at realworldsystems.net
Read my weblog at http://blog.realworldsystems.net

Bookmark and Share

Home   About CharityVillage  |  Free Newsletter  |  Media Centre  |  Contact Us
   Terms and Conditions of Use  |  Privacy Policy    © CharityVillage Ltd.  All rights reserved.    Email help@charityvillage.com